Is it really a religious discourse of the government is characterized by moderation? Is it really can be described as tolerance? Is every government religious discourse necessarily tolerant? Is all that contradicts the discourse described in the middle is a harsh, extremist or terrorist speech? Who defines, evaluates and distinguishes between central and non-religious? Central ?, What are the features of religious discourse, which can be divided by mediocrity ?.The most difficult question indeed needs a kind of real revelation: Why is the official religious discourse of the ruling regime always the middle and tolerant discourse? What are the signs of tolerance ?, What are the features of moderation? And why is it always the official doctrine of the ruler is the doctrine compatible and God's law and what is contrary to the doctrines closer to extremism and extremism?The problem is much more complicated than what we ask and envision, and it really needs effort and patience to break the tangle